BIOSOFT™THE WORLD'S FIRST SUSTAINABLE BIO-BASED EAR PLUGS
HERITAGE.CLASSIC GOES SAFETY.
BIOSOFT™THE WORLD'S FIRST SUSTAINABLE BIO-BASED EAR PLUGS
G-TEK® PARADOX®ULTRA LIGHTWEIGHT
URBAN EFFECT.EFFORTLESS WORK.
EZ-Twist™NO NEED TO ROLL
PUMA SAFETYSAFETY SHOES
HEAVY DUTY.WHERE ROUGH MEETS TOUGH.
LEARNING CENTERHEARING PROTECTION
For years, A2 and A3 cut-resistant gloves were the go-to standard for hand protection. But today’s fast-paced workplaces – where new materials, faster processes and unexpected distractions are the norm – the risks are evolving. As hazards become less predictable, the need for better protection is more critical than ever. That’s why upgrading to ANSI/ISEA 105-2024 A4-A6 gloves could be the key to ensuring workers stay safer in dynamic environments.
Industrial and construction workers have always faced hazards from sharp materials like sheet metal, glass, and wire. These risks haven’t necessarily increased, but the expectation for better protection has. Some safety managers continue to default to A2-A3 gloves - perhaps out of habit - despite the fact that higher cut levels provide a much-needed safety margin against these ever-present hazards.
A common misconception is that cut resistance is only determined by how sharp the blade is. However, the force applied to the glove—whether from pressure, motion, or an angle—also plays a significant role in whether a glove holds up to the hazard. Even a relatively dull blade can cut through a lower-level glove if enough force or pressure is applied. This is where A4-A6 gloves make a difference—they are significantly more resistant.
Many may visualize cut risks as clean, sharp blades slicing through fabric. But in industrial and construction environments, most hazards aren’t blades at all - they’re jagged and rough edges.
Even under low magnification, the edges of sheet metal, wire and many assembly parts look more like serrated teeth than smooth knives. These irregular edges don’t glide over the glove surface - they catch, tear and shred fibers, making lower cut-resistant gloves ineffective.
In the past, higher cut levels meant gloves tended to be thick, stiff, and uncomfortable. Workers avoided wearing them, leading to poor comfort and lack of dexterity. That’s no longer the case.
Years ago, moving from an A2 glove to an A4 or A5 meant a significant cost jump. Now, advancements in material science have made higher cut levels more affordable, meaning companies can improve protection without breaking the budget.
While A2 and A3 gloves can provide adequate protection for some hazards, the reality is that industrial environments are unpredictable. Different edge types, force levels and materials make it difficult to anticipate all possible risks. By choosing A4-A6 gloves, you can increase the margin of safety and ensure workers are better protected when hazards arise.
If there’s an opportunity to reduce workplace injuries and improve protection, why not take it? Increasing the margin of safety is always a smart decision. Hazards are unpredictable, and having an extra layer of protection ensures that workers are better prepared for sudden risks.
It’s a valid question: if higher cut levels provide more protection, why stop at A4-A6? Here’s why A7-A9 gloves aren’t always the best choice for industrial and construction settings:
A7-A9 gloves are designed for extreme cut risks - think meat processing, heavy-duty glass handling or heavy-duty assembly.
In most industrial and construction environments, hazards are jagged edges, not ultra-sharp blades, making A4-A6 the better practical choice.
Over-specifying gloves increases cost without adding meaningful protection for most workers.
Despite advancements, higher cut-resistant gloves typically require denser, stronger fibers, making them stiffer.
Workers handling tools, materials or fast-paced tasks may struggle with dexterity in A7-A9 gloves.
If gloves reduce hand mobility, workers are less likely to wear them consistently, leading to higher non-compliance and more injuries.
A7-A9 gloves are more expensive, and in environments where A4-A6 already provides sufficient protection, the extra cost doesn’t justify the marginal benefit.
Safety managers must balance protection with realities. Trends and sales volumes indicate A4-A6 gloves offer the best ROI for most workplaces; however, only safety managers have the unique advantage of having evaluated the workplace hazards and tasks to determine the optimal level of cut resistance required. It's a proactive step toward safer workplaces and healthier workers. If reducing workplace injuries and safeguarding your workforce is within reach, why hesitate?
Ensure your team has the right level of cut protection. Contact us today to learn how upgrading to A4-A6 gloves can enhance safety without compromising comfort or budget. Don’t wait until an injury occurs - take proactive steps to safeguard your workers today.
LATHAM, NY – June 21, 2023 – Protective Industrial Products, Inc. (“PIP®”), a global leader in personal protective equipment (PPE) including hand protection, above-the-neck pr…
READ MORELATHAM, NY – May 16, 2023 – Protective Industrial Products, Inc. (“PIP®”), a global leader in personal protective equipment (PPE) including hand protection, above-the-neck pr…
READ MOREThe Psychology Behind Effective Food Safety Culture
What’s the first thing you think of when you see a firefighter helmet? If your answer was hero, rescue, save, protect or first responder, you’d be in line with the majority of Americans. The…
READ MOREPrivacy Policy | Contact Us | Full Site
© 2012-2025 Protective Industrial Products, Inc. All rights reserved.
CALL US TODAY: +44 (0) 1902 451 451